The Recovery and Resilience Program (PRR) aims to promote sustainable development and reduce inequalities in disadvantaged communities. This page provides details on resource allocation, distribution criteria, and progress of initiatives within the Porto Metropolitan Area (AMP).
Distribution of Funds by Municipality
The funds were distributed according to criteria such as vulnerable population, geographical area, and specific proposals from the municipalities, guaranteeing, however, an initial allocation of €2 million per municipality in order to ensure a minimum amount of municipal investment.
Atualizado a 00.00.2024
Contract amount
€117,920,789.22
€117.9 million
Executed amount
10.31%
€12,160,060.46
Territorial interventions
€119,022,000.00
€119 million
Executed amount
€2,478,000.00
€2.4 million
Updated 00.00.2024
Contract amount
€20,215,000.00
€20.2 million
Executed amount
15.40%
€3,695,302.41
Updated 00.00.2024
Contract amount
€20,215,000.00
€20.2 million
Executed amount
0.46%
€92,563.16 €
Updated 00.00.2024
Contract amount
€16,551,000.00
€16.5 million
Executed amount
7.65%
€1,266,682.95
Updated 00.00.2024
Contract amount
€20,246,094.97
€20.2 million
Executed amount
12.39%
€2,509,481.66
Updated 00.00.2024
Contract amount
€12,689,673.23
€12.6 million
Executed amount
19.61%
€2,488,409.14
Updated 00.00.2024
Contract amount
€24,229,799.96
€24.2 million
Executed amount
8.70%
€2,107,621.14
Allocation Criteria
As part of the process of distributing RRP funds to disadvantaged communities, each municipality received an initial fixed amount of €2 million. This amount was guaranteed equally for all, regardless of the individual characteristics or needs of each municipality.
In addition to this fixed amount, the remainder of the available funds was distributed based on specific criteria that varied according to the particularities of each municipality. These criteria included:
1. Vulnerable population (up to 90%): A considerable portion of the amount was allocated based on the size and needs of the most vulnerable populations in each municipality.
2. Geographic area (up to 10%): A smaller proportion of resources was distributed considering the size or territorial extension of the municipality.
3. Specific needs of municipalities: Additional aspects specific to each municipality, such as proposals submitted or development indicators, also influenced the distribution.
This model sought to ensure an equitable initial distribution (two million per municipality) while adapting the allocation of remaining resources to the actual needs and specific characteristics of each locality.
Check the project list
Archive
Share